Published
2 months agoon
By
bindu
A new poll number may suggest that the public endorsement of Taylor Swift, stating Kamala Harris as the president in 2024, does not go exactly according to the vice president’s plans.
Public endorsement by Swift after the first debate between the vice president and former President Donald Trump has brought mixed reactions that alter the electoral makeup.
The singer endorsed Harris on Instagram last week, praising her for steadfast leadership and dedication to key issues.
She adds, “I believe she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos.
Even while Swift commands the support of millions, surveys show that her public appearance may not be having the impact on voters as imagined.
According to a Quinnipiac University poll conducted September 19-22, 76 percent of likely voters reported that Taylor Swift’s endorsement made no difference in their level of support for Harris’ candidacy. Thank you for watching
While 9 percent felt more excited, 13 percent felt less enthused as a result of Swift’s involvement.
This lukewarm response is consistent with the findings of a July poll conducted by Newsweek and Redfield & Wilton Strategies.
This survey suggests that 26 percent of Gen Z voters are less likely to vote for a politician supported by Swift, implying that not all individuals appreciate her support.
Experts are not sure if the endorsement will give any ground. University of Portsmouth lecturer on American politics Dafydd Townley says Swift’s stance is unlikely to change much-about her hard-core fans, at least-in the majority, as many might already be inclining toward voting for Harris.
Political scientist Thomas Gift of University College London said that Swift’s massive cultural influence might have some influence, particularly among the young.
Although one would think that celebrity endorsements would have a great deal to win out of and from utilizing the same medium for political causes, as mentioned earlier, not always does the same translate to political gains.
At this point when we are entering into election season this year 2024, it will be interesting to see how Taylor Swift’s decision works out for Kamala Harris.
Taylor Swift’s influence on pop culture and politics is apparent. As one of the world’s most known faces, her influence extends beyond music to advocacy, voting rights, and gender equality.
Swift’s recent support for progressive issues and candidates, such as Vice President Kamala Harris, has stirred both enthusiasm and disagreement.
While many see Swift’s political involvement as a positive force, there is growing concern that her backing may have unforeseen effects for Harris and other politicians.
Taylor Swift’s Political Activism
Taylor Swift has grown as a notable political figure, particularly with her 2018 decision to support Democratic candidates in the midterm elections.
She has regularly used her platform to advocate for voting rights, gender equality, LGBTQ+ issues, and social justice.
Her efforts were particularly remarkable in persuading young people to participate in important elections, such as the 2020 presidential contest.
Swift’s 2020 endorsement of Kamala Harris was viewed as a boon for the Biden-Harris campaign, particularly among young people.
Harris has advocated for a number of causes that Swift supporters support, including women’s rights and racial justice.
However, some analysts suggest that Swift’s enormous influence may be more complex, posing both benefits and challenges for Harris.
The Positive Effect of Swift’s Support
There’s no doubting that Swift’s support for progressive candidates like Kamala Harris may spark interest and enthusiasm, especially among younger people.
Swift has an army of devoted supporters, many of whom share her views on social and political issues. When Swift calls for action, her followers get out in droves—whether to vote, support a cause, or lobby for change.
Swift’s endorsement strengthens Kamala Harris’ appeal to younger people, particularly millennials and Generation Z, who value honesty and activity.
Swift’s brand of feminism and activism for vulnerable people complements Harris’ own political views.
This collaboration results in a mutually advantageous arrangement in which Swift gives her platform to Harris while Harris wins traction with important voter demographics.
The Unexpected Downside: Polarization
Swift’s endorsement has energized many, but it may also alienate some votes. Critics believe that Swift’s public activism may polarize certain elements of the population, who consider her as overtly political or out of touch with more moderate or conservative ideas.
In fact, a substantial number of Harris’ potential voters may be alienated from celebrity endorsements and see Swift’s support as a symbol of elitism or Hollywood’s dominance in politics.
Swift’s endorsement of Harris, for example, may be used by opponents to argue that Harris is leaning too far into “celebrity politics.” Those who already view Harris skeptically may perceive her collaboration with Swift as catering to leftist elites rather than addressing average American concerns.
This might widen the gap between Harris’s progressive supporters and the more moderate voters she needs to win over.
Furthermore, Swift’s progressive opinions on LGBTQ+ rights and social justice, while widely celebrated, continue to polarize conservative and centrist voters.
For some, Harris’ involvement in politics may cement the perception that she represents the far left, a moniker that her opponents have tried to impose on her since her vice-presidential campaign.
Backlash among conservative circles
The political landscape in the United States remains profoundly divided, and celebrity endorsements frequently serve as rallying points for opponents.
Swift’s history of taking strong positions against Donald Trump and other conservative individuals may spark further attacks on Harris from the right.
In fact, already, political activity by Swift is condemned by some conservative critics who, once again conclude that celebrities are turning their faith on the general public.
Swift’s backing for Kamala Harris could make her a lightning rod for the conservative media, portraying her as an out-of-touch member of “Hollywood’s elite” promoting liberal political figures.
This narrative could continue to damage her image with swing voters or those who dislike the role of celebrities in politics.
The Celebrity-Politics Connection
The relationship between celebrity culture and politics has, of course been as complicated for as long as anyone can remember.
At the same time, on the flip side, celebrities like Taylor Swift raise important issues by utilizing very powerful influence to highlight key political matters and mobilize more voters.
But at the same time they may alienate some parts of the electorate, who see this popular endorsement as a distraction and an unwanted meddling.
Managing her relationship with Swift and others like her would be very important for the prospect of Kamala Harris in surfing through the turbulence of the world of politics.
She will have to control the excitement that such endorsement carries on one hand and tread very carefully that such association does not come across as overdependence on celebrity endorsements rather than policies and problems of everyday Americans.
Conclusion:
The Double-Edged Sword of Swift’s Support
Taylor Swift’s endorsement for Kamala Harris has both possible pros and cons. Taylor Swift’s popularity energizes youth, which means it supports the very progressive ideals that Harris backs.
On the other hand, her engagement could further alienate the divisive nature of the election, making this even harder for moderate or conservative voters who may feel that Taylor is some actress from Hollywood cut off from reality for many of them.
Of course, the relationship between celebrity culture and politics is pretty tangled up. While Swift’s campaign will likely continue to click with her millions of admirers, Kamala Harris would need to be very cautious in the political waters so as not to unwittingly let it backfire with Swift’s support.