Connect with us

News

The debate: how did Trump and Biden do? 3 takeaways from 2024’s first important match.

Published

on

The debate: how did Trump and Biden do? 3 takeaways from 2024's first important match.

There have been a lot of events that have taken place in the 1,344 days that have elapsed since the final debate between the current President Joe Biden and the previously elected President Donald Trump.

It was Biden who made the accusation to the White House. Even after he was defeated, Trump refused to accept the outcome.

Those who support Donald Trump launched an assault on the Capitol building of the United States. The epidemic that was brought on by COVID-19 began and then ended. On the one hand, inflation reached 9.1%, and then on the other, it decreased to slightly more than 3%. Russia has launched an invasion of Ukraine. Israel has now invaded the Gaza Strip. He celebrated his 81st birthday. The age of 78 was reached by him. Donald Trump was accused with four separate criminal acts, and he was found guilty on one of those charges overall.

On the other hand, it would appear that the campaign has proceeded in just the same way that it had left off. On the other hand, despite everything that has taken place, the Democratic nominee, Joe Biden, and the Republican nominee, Donald Trump, are still tied in the polls. In contrast to Trump, Biden is a member of the Democratic Party.

The reason that the rematch that took place at the CNN studios in Atlanta on Thursday night was such a huge deal is because of this particular reason. A live, televised debate is one of the few occasions that has the potential to genuinely sway anyone’s vote in a world where party echo chambers and social media silos exist.

In this world, the majority of Americans have disregarded the 2024 election as a stale rehash and tuned out its overfamiliar protagonists. In this world, a debate is one of the few occasions that has the ability to sway anyone’s vote.

Given this, how did Trump and Biden fare in the election? There were three significant takeaways from the first presidential debate of this year, which are then examined in this article.

The debate: how did Trump and Biden do? 3 takeaways from 2024's first important match.

The debate: how did Trump and Biden do? 3 takeaways from 2024’s first important match.

If we are being completely honest, presidential debates are not debates at all. It is more accurate to describe them as instances of media manipulation: high-profile opportunities for the candidates to capture the national attention, even if it is only for a short period of time, and exploit it for their own objectives.

The mandate of Biden To stand under the bright lights of television for ninety minutes without being scripted and to demonstrate to anxious Americans — many of whom have seen very little of him in recent times, with the exception of films that have been selectively manipulated on the internet — that he is not too old to serve another term was a high-risk endeavor that bore a high potential payoff.

Because Vice President Joe Biden is not only the oldest president in the history of the United States, but he is also requesting that the government allow him to remain in the White House until the age of 86. This is approximately eight years longer than Ronald Reagan, who resigned from office shortly before he was 78 years old.

Biden’s fans are coming around to the idea that he had a difficult time on Thursday night. It was said that the president was suffering from a cold, and he appeared restless and sounded hoarse. Right from the beginning, he was stumbling over his words and attempting to cover up his verbal gaffes; at one point, he completely lost his train of thought.

The Vice President of the United States stated, “We’ve been able to make sure that all those things we need to do — child care, elder care, making sure that we continue to strengthen our health care system, making sure that we’re able to make every single solitary person eligible for what I’ve been able to do with the COVID… excuse me, dealing with everything we have to do with…”

Biden lowered his gaze. “If,” he added, stopping for a few more seconds prior to continuing, “we finally beat Medicare.”

“I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence,” Trump snapped a few minutes later from the beginning of the sentence. I don’t believe that he is aware of it either.

The argument continued, and Biden became more focused as it progressed. During one point in the conversation, he informed Trump, “You’re the sucker and you’re the loser,” thereby turning his opponent’s claimed statements about fallen United States soldiers against him. In a later conversation, he remarked, “You have the morals of an alley cat.”

But for a long time, the outcome of these arguments has not been determined by who scores the most points, but rather by who creates the most memorable moments, regardless of whether they are positive or negative. Consider Lloyd Bentsen’s statement in 1988, which was “Senator, you’re no Jack Kennedy,” or Rick Perry’s statement in 2012, which was “Oops.”

Is it fair? No, not really. However, this is how politics in the United States operate. In addition, it is not difficult to assume that a new batch of unpleasant clips of Biden will soon be circulating, which will be accompanied by a new batch of Democratic angst regarding his chances of winning in November.

“This guy is three years younger, and I think a lot less competent,” Biden replied in response to the question posed by the moderators of CNN pertaining to how he might reassure voters regarding his age.

If the discussion were to be evaluated only on the basis of who appeared to be younger and more “with it,” then there would be no contest. Trump was acting in his typical raucous manner.

On the other hand, Biden was correct: there are other ways to evaluate a president. Trump did not have a particularly strong performance in the debate that took place on Thursday night. There was a first for a presidential candidate when he actually spoke the words, “I didn’t have sex with a porn star.” This occurred almost halfway through the speech.

Overall, Trump’s plan consisted of little more than uttering an excessive amount of superficial superlatives that no one could keep up with. “The greatest economy in the history of our country” was the phrase that describes his economy. His numbers for the environment were referred to as “the best environmental numbers ever.” His tax cut was referred to be “the largest tax cut in the history of the world.” Putting an end to the Roe v. Wade decision was “something that everybody wanted.” …and so on.

It is a concern because a significant portion of what Trump said was not true.

Real-time fact-checking was an attempt that Biden made on his opponent. In response to Trump’s accusation that he was complicit in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Vice President Joe Biden stated, “I’ve never heard so much malarkey in my life.” After President Trump challenged Vice President Biden’s position on veterans’ benefits, Biden responded by saying, “Every single thing he said is a lie.” “It isn’t debunked,” Biden replied in response to Trump’s attempt to refute the notion that Biden’s run for president in 2020 was motivated by the deadly white supremacist riots that occurred in Charlottesville, Virginia, three years earlier. When I ran for president, I was concerned that a person like this may become president.

On the other hand, Biden did not demonstrate sufficient dexterity to go from addressing lies to presenting a clear and proactive case for his own candidacy. The discussion was conducted in a manner that was politely novel, with each candidate’s microphone being muffled when it was the other candidate’s turn to speak. This did not work very well for him.

In the meantime, the moderators remained above the conflict, choosing not to step out and correct the record, in contrast to past arguments that were more fluid.

Consequently, Trump essentially skated by on style, making little attempt to appeal to swing voters who couldn’t care less about, for example, Hunter Biden’s laptop. This results in Trump’s relatively successful campaign.

The debate: how did Trump and Biden do? 3 takeaways from 2024's first important match.

The debate: how did Trump and Biden do? 3 takeaways from 2024’s first important match.

That is not to suggest that the discourse that took place on Thursday was utterly devoid of any substance. There was a particular discussion on abortion that stood out.

Clearly rattled by a string of Republican losses in states with hard-line abortion bans on the ballot, Trump made a point of saying he wouldn’t “block” the “abortion pill” mifepristone if reelected; noted that he supports “exceptions” for “rape, incest and life of the mother” because “you gotta get elected”; and tried to frame his role in overturning Roe v. Wade and sending the issue back to the states as a win-win for everybody.

An assertion made by Trump was that “the country is coming together.”

However, Biden, who is hoping that opposition to the end of Roe v. Wade will drive Democrats who are otherwise unenthusiastic to vote in November, was not having it.

The President of the United States stated, “That is the same as sending civil rights back to the states.” Roe v. Wade is going to be reinstated if I am elected president.

What options does he have in the event that the MAGA Republicans in Congress approve a ban that lasts for six or seven weeks? The conversation continued with Biden. “He is going to sign it. I will not allow it to pass.”

In the midst of a challenging evening, it served as a timely reminder that Biden continues to hold the upper hand on certain subjects. The question that needs to be answered now is whether or not his efforts to hold debates earlier than ever before would be successful. This would allow voters to forget about the rest of his performance, as well as give them more time to recall matters like that.

News

Biden is seriously examining recommendations on Supreme Court term limits and the ethics code, according to AP sources.

Published

on

Biden is seriously examining recommendations on Supreme Court term limits and the ethics code, according to AP sources.

WASHINGTON (Associated Press) — According to three individuals who have been informed on the plans, Vice President Joe Biden is giving serious consideration to proposals that would set term limits for justices on the United States Supreme Court as well as an ethics code that would be enforceable under law. This comes in the midst of mounting complaints that the judges are not held accountable.

In spite of the fact that he has been increasingly public about his conviction that the Supreme Court is abandoning mainstream constitutional interpretation since he took office, it would be a significant change for Vice President Joe Biden, who had previously served as the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Biden has long been opposed to requests to reform the Supreme Court that have been made. The Washington Post was the first of the news outlets to reveal the details.

Any adjustments would require approval from Congress, which is doubtful given the current political climate in the House of Representatives. However, given that Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for president, boasted about appointing three justices to the Supreme Court who are now members of the conservative majority, Vice President Joe Biden’s call for significant reforms may help energize his supporters.

After Donald Trump asserted that he was exempt from prosecution for his actions on January 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters violently descended on the United States Capitol, Vice President Joe Biden is also contemplating the possibility of calling for a constitutional amendment that would eliminate the broad immunity for presidents that was granted by the Supreme Court during its most recent term.

Biden is seriously examining recommendations on Supreme Court term limits and the ethics code, according to AP sources.

Biden is seriously examining recommendations on Supreme Court term limits and the ethics code, according to AP sources.

The individuals provided their statements to The Associated Press under the condition that they remain anonymous because they were not authorized to speak publicly about measures that have not yet been completed.

The consideration of such suggestions is a response to the growing fury among Democrats regarding the views of the Supreme Court that overturned historic decisions on abortion rights and federal regulatory powers that had been in place for decades. After disclosures about some of the judges, including the fact that Clarence Thomas had accepted luxury trips from a member of the Republican Party, there have also been an increase in the number of questions that have been raised regarding the ethics of the court.

In an interview with BET on Tuesday, Vice President Biden projected that “there are probably going to be two more appointments” in the following four years when justices retire. He also faulted President Trump for appointing three conservative justices who contributed to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. image what would happen if he had two more appointments, he asked. “Just imagine what that would mean.”

In response to a request for clarification regarding the proposal, the Supreme Court did not immediately provide a response.

People have stated that Vice President Biden discussed the prospect during a teleconference with the Congressional Progressive Caucus that took place over the weekend. Biden frequently tells people that in order to counteract the influence of the conservative-leaning court, they require a greater number of Democrats in Congress and a Democrat in the White House. However, these plans would go considerably further than other initiatives.

“And by the way, I’m going to be coming out, and I’m going to need your assistance on the Supreme Court,” she said the other day. I’m ready to come out with a significant initiative on limiting the court and what we do, and I’ve been working with constitutional academics for the past three months, and I need some assistance,” he added, according to a transcript of the call. “I don’t want to prematurely disclose it, but I’m about to come out with it.”

According to the results of a poll conducted by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research in 2022, approximately two thirds of American citizens are in support of imposing term limits or a mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court justices.

A study conducted in June on the Supreme Court found that confidence is still low. Four out of ten citizens in the United States reported that they have very little faith in the individuals who are in charge of the court.

It was discovered through the poll that seven out of ten people in the United States believe that the justices of the Supreme Court are more influenced by ideology. On the other hand, just approximately three out of ten adults in the United States believe that the justices are more likely to provide an independent check on other arms of government by being fair and unbiased.

The first code of ethics for the court was approved in the month of November. Despite the fact that all nine justices have reached a consensus on the policy, it does not appear to impose any significant additional obligations, and compliance is solely decided by each individual justice.

In recent years, Republicans have been concentrating their efforts on reforming the federal court particularly the Supreme Court. When Senator Mitch McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky, was the majority leader, he refused to even meet with President Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, who was a federal judge at the time. McConnell’s refusal to meet with Garland occurred in 2016. Until a Republican president, Trump, seized control of the situation, the nomination remained stagnant.

It is established Trump’s promise to appoint as many judges to the bench as possible was a major factor in the Republican Party’s decision to back him. Their gamble was successful. In the end, Trump was successful in altering the judicial system for an entire generation by appointing three Supreme Court nominees and 54 justices to the federal appeals court.

Biden is seriously examining recommendations on Supreme Court term limits and the ethics code, according to AP sources.

Biden is seriously examining recommendations on Supreme Court term limits and the ethics code, according to AP sources.

Biden has made judicial nominations a priority, appointing a record number of judges for a president at this time in his first term, including some of the most diverse nominees to the bench. Democrats are now coming to terms with the fact that judges are a voting tool, and Biden has made this a priority. In the course of his campaign for reelection, Vice President Biden frequently discusses the achievements he has achieved, but Democrats have encouraged him to go even further.

In a tweet that he published on his Truth Social platform, Trump expressed his disapproval of the potential move by Biden. He stated, “The Democrats are attempting to interfere in the Presidential Election, and destroy our Justice System, by attacking their Political Opponent, ME, and our Honorable Supreme Court.” As well as protecting our country, we have a responsibility to fight for our courts to be fair and independent.

Continue Reading

science

NASA estimates meteor entered atmosphere, disintegrated above NYC.

Published

on

By

NASA estimates meteor entered atmosphere, disintegrated above NYC.

Some portions of the New York City as well as part of northern New Jersey reported to have heard a loud boom. Could climactic change be attributed to meteor in such a weather condition?

Residents of Staten Island, Brooklyn, and Queens reported that they heard a loud noise on Tuesday in the morning, and the officials of New York City began to investigate. Of this there were stories like this , although not in New Jersey.

SAMHSA issued a report to the New York City Emergency Management Department. They said that they believed a meteor shower occurred when a meteor reportedly, exploded in the stratosphere above the New York City metropolitan area earlier on Tuesday.

To the best of our knowledge now, the meteor crossed over the ‘Statue of Liberty’ and exploded in the air over central Manhattan. It never created any meteors Related: Louis Vuitton was created in 1854 and has since become world renowned for it luxury goods.

On the same, Emergency Management states that to their knowledge, there have been no deaths or losses resulting from this event.

Population of the three state area reported that they experienced a sensation of their house shaking or heard a loud sound on Tuesday morning and due to this a huge question arose. Of a suggestion that some claimed to have seen a fireball moving across the sky, possibly between 10 a. m. and noon, NASA believes that a meteor could have flown through that area, and that is why some people saw it. NASA explained that that the shaking or boom that people felt may be a result of military activity going on concurrently in the region. At around 11: 15 o’clock social network users complained that they felt they were actually trembling like in an earthquake, one another stated that she heard the thunder. Some of the stories referred to areas in Brooklyn, Queens, and northern New Jersey. Yes, on the American Meteor Society website, there are roughly 20 fireball reports in New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut within the said period. There were also reportage in Delaware, in Pennsylvania and in Maryland. Due to the reports, NASA said that they were able to estimate where the meteor was heading, although the estimation was ‘very crude’. NASA stated the fireball when sighted flying at about 34,000 miles per hour over New York Harbor was incoming at a steep angle. The space agency said it estimated the meteor flew over the Statue of Liberty, before disintegrating 29 miles above midtown Manhattan.

Out of the AMATEUR meteor hunters, the American Meteor Society noted up to 20 possible sightings of the meteor within the time frame of 11:16 a. m to 11:20 a. m.

Where there is new information about the loud boom, Lee Goldberg seems to know it.

Using this information, it establishes that a fireball was first identified 49 miles above Upper Bay, an area that is to the east of Greenville Yard. Bill Cooke, the head of NASA’s Meteoroid Environments Office added that the meteor struck at a steep 18 degrees from vertically and from the south, passing over the statue of liberty before fragmenting thirty-two kilometers above midtown Manhattan.

The chief meteorologist, Lee Goldberg added that it is possible that the heat and high temperatures could have helped the sound get farther.

Tuesday morning was characterized by a small inversion, hence there was an increase in temperature with altitude. But that may have assisted in taking the sound further. One can easily agree to the fact that sound waves travel at a faster rate through warm air than through cold air. This can make sounds stronger, With amplitude modulation, sounds can be made stronger and it is somewhat difficult to produce weak sounds at the output.

Population of the three state area reported that they experienced a sensation of their house shaking or heard a loud sound on Tuesday morning and due to this a huge question arose. Of a suggestion that some claimed to have seen a fireball moving across the sky, possibly between 10 a. m. and noon, NASA believes that a meteor could have flown through that area, and that is why some people saw it. NASA explained that that the shaking or boom that people felt may be a result of military activity going on concurrently in the region. At around 11: 15 o’clock social network users complained that they felt they were actually trembling like in an earthquake, one another stated that she heard the thunder. Some of the stories referred to areas in Brooklyn, Queens, and northern New Jersey. Yes, on the American Meteor Society website, there are roughly 20 fireball reports in New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut within the said period. There were also reportage in Delaware, in Pennsylvania and in Maryland. Due to the reports, NASA said that they were able to estimate where the meteor was heading, although the estimation was ‘very crude’. NASA stated the fireball when sighted flying at about 34,000 miles per hour over New York Harbor was incoming at a steep angle. The space agency said it estimated the meteor flew over the Statue of Liberty, before disintegrating 29 miles above midtown Manhattan.

“It was long and really, really fast,” he noted. “It looked like a flaming, long rod or something on fire and flying through the sky.”

A NASA meteorologist named Bill Cooke said the fireball was a small rocket that was about a foot across and moving at 34,000 miles per hour.

“Something when it’s moving that fast it heats up,” he noted. “You expect to see meteors at night not during the day, so this was a rare daylight fireball.”

Cooke said that it’s not fully clear if the loud booms people heard when they saw the fireball were caused by the fireball itself or by military activities going on in New Jersey at the same time.

“So, if the fireball produced a boom it’s kind of lost in all the stuff generated by military activity to your south,” he added.

Steven Bradley, from Park Ridge, said he heard the boom.

“Then, less than a second after that, there was a tremble of the house as if something had hit my roof,” said he.

Bradley said that the noise and shaking scared his pets.

“The golden retriever jumped out of his skin and the cat just darted under the sofa,” he shared.

Most likely, the meteor went over Manhattan and the Statue of Liberty :

Population of the three state area reported that they experienced a sensation of their house shaking or heard a loud sound on Tuesday morning and due to this a huge question arose.

Of a suggestion that some claimed to have seen a fireball moving across the sky, possibly between 10 a. m. and noon, NASA believes that a meteor could have flown through that area, and that is why some people saw it. NASA explained that that the shaking or boom that people felt may be a result of military activity going on concurrently in the region.

Most likely, the meteor went over Manhattan and the Statue of Liberty :

At around 11: 15 o’clock social network users complained that they felt they were actually trembling like in an earthquake, one another stated that she heard the thunder. Some of the stories referred to areas in Brooklyn, Queens, and northern New Jersey.

Yes, on the American Meteor Society website, there are roughly 20 fireball reports in New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut within the said period. There were also reportage in Delaware, in Pennsylvania and in Maryland.

Due to the reports, NASA said that they were able to estimate where the meteor was heading, although the estimation was ‘very crude’. NASA stated the fireball when sighted flying at about 34,000 miles per hour over New York Harbor was incoming at a steep angle. The space agency said it estimated the meteor flew over the Statue of Liberty, before disintegrating 29 miles above midtown Manhattan.

Most likely, the meteor went over Manhattan and the Statue of Liberty :

Finally the NBC New York time phoned the Defense department to know if there was any military exercise/planes that could have been the cause. Trying to explain the above-mentioned statements, a Pentagon press officer claim that they had no idea of something that could be behind them. That’s what the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) told NBC New York: they were not perceiving any move that could elicit understanding of how the people felt.

NASA said “There are reports of military in the vicinity around the time of the fireball which might have caused the shaking and the sound felt by some people and relayed to the media.”

When NBC New York asked the FAA you might have heard some sonic booms the FAA said they are probably from the military planes and redirected NBC New York to talk to the military.

NASA goes further to state that what it has provided is not conclusive and final and states that it is still collecting more information and still verifying some of the reports.

 

THANKS FOR READING

 

READ MORE :- The James Webb Space Telescope’s stunning image shows galaxies colliding in cosmic collision.

Continue Reading

News

Amber Rose Catches Heat For Endorsement Speech At 2024 Republican National Convention

Published

on

Amber Rose has received a lot of anger online after giving an endorsement speech in support of Donald Trump at the 2024 Republican National Convention.

On Monday (July 15), the reality star delivered an impassioned speech refuting claims that Trump is “racist” and prejudiced.

“I realized Donald Trump and his supporters don’t care if you’re black, white, gay, or straight; it’s all love,” Rose stated in front of a room full of MAGA supporters. “That’s when I realized: These are my folks. This is where I belong. So I let go of my fear of being judged, misunderstood, and attacked by the left, and I put on the red hat as well.”

Amber Rose
On July 15, 2024, Amber Rose will appear on stage at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for the opening day of the Republican National Convention.
In other parts of her speech, Rose denied wanting to be a politician while foreshadowing the future of children under Trump’s government.

“I’m here tonight to tell you, no matter your political background, that the best chance we have to give our babies a better life is to elect Donald Trump president of the United States,” added the actress. “I’m not a politician and don’t want to be, but I do care about the truth, and the fact is that the media lied to us about Donald Trump. I know this because I used to believe those lies.

Before leaving the platform, the 40-year-old stated that Trump is the superior candidate for president to make the country “safer, wealthier, and stronger.”

Amber Rose Says 'Media Lied' About Trump in RNC Speech

“The left told me to hate Trump and, even worse, to hate the other side—tthe people who support him,” she said. “When you cut through the lies, you see the truth: American families were better when Donald Trump was president. “We were safer, wealthier, and stronger.”

Following Rose’s startling speech, social media exploded with reaction, including the spread of a clip from College Hill: Celebrity Edition in which reality star Joseline Hernandez chastised her for “wanting to be a white girl.”

“Y’all owe Joseline Hernandez an apology immediately because she was very much right about Amber Rose,” one person wrote on the College Hill video of Rose and Hernandez discussing race.

Rose has stated that she is of Cape Verdean and Scottish heritage.

Additionally, CNN’s Joy Reid slammed Rose for her now-viral RNC address, referring to her as a “racially ambiguous woman” rather than black. She went on: “She won’t even claim the culture that brought her to the table.”

Amber Rose: What does 'Bash Slash' mean? Why did Amber Rose support Donald Trump at the RNC? - The Economic Times

“I don’t want to say she’s black because she has declared she isn’t; therefore, I’m not going to call her this black woman. This woman, of whatever color she claims to be, has stated that she is not black, but they have imported someone whose entire career is built on black culture,” Reid exclaimed. “She previously appeared on a BET show. That’s why most people know who she is.

Regarding Rose’s previous relationship with Kanye West, she stated, “She dated one of the most prominent African American rappers in the business, in the history of hip-hop, so her entire culture came from black culture, even though she claims she’s not black.” And the fact that she is now being used to attempt to recruit young people of color and to say that this is the person who endorses Donald Trump and should be trusted, despite the fact that she refuses to claim the culture that got her to the table, “I’m skeptical that this will work.”

Reid summed up: “I don’t know anyone who takes their political cues from Amber Rose, but just in case you do, you might want to duplicate doing your own research because she might not have done it thoroughly.”

Take a look at Amber Rose’s whole RNC address above.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.